王富刚

（漯河医学高等专科学校，河南省休闲食品工程技术研究中心，河南省营养与健康工程研究中心，河南 漯河 462002）

摘要：用Page 检验和Kramer 检验对4 种苹果醋饮料的统计数据进行了计算分析，结果表明，在Page 检验与Kramer 检验的整体差异性上，四种苹果醋饮料之间有显著性差异；经分组后，两个检验分组得出了相同的结果，即这4 种苹果醋饮料可分为3 组：（626、126）、（727）、（363），626 和727、363 苹果醋饮料之间有显著性差异，126 和727、363 苹果醋饮料之间有显著性差异，727 和363 苹果醋饮料之间有显著差异，626 和126 苹果醋饮料之间无显著差异，且626 和126 苹果醋饮料最受评价员的喜欢，727 样品次之，363 样品最不喜欢。

关键词：Page 检验；Kramer 检验；感官评定；苹果醋饮料

Application of Two Different Methods in Sensory Evaluation of Apple Vinegar Beverage

WANG Fu-gang

（Luohe Medical College，Henan Leisure Food Engineering Technology Research Center，Henan Nutrition and HealthEngineering Research Center，Luohe 462002，China）

Abstract: The Page test and Kramer test were used to calculate and analyze the statistical data of four apple cidervinegars. The results showed that there were significant differences between the four apple cider vinegars in theoverall difference between Page test and Kramer test. The same result was obtained after divided into two groups，namely the four apple vinegar can be divided into three groups:（626，126），（727），and（363）；between 626 and727，363，apple cider vinegar has significant difference；between 126 and 727，363，apple cider vinegar hadsignificant differences；apple cider vinegar had a significant difference between 727 and 363；there was no significantdifference between 626 and 126 apple cider vinegar，apple cider vinegar 626 and 126 were most liked by reviewers，followed by 727 samples，and 363 samples were the lest favorite.

Key words: page test；kramer test；sensory evaluation；apple cider vinegar

中图分类号：TS207.3     文献标志码：A      文章编号：1007-7871（2022）05-0021-04

2022，Vol.25，No.5